MY
CARBON FOOTPRINT
I
was very surprised by my result.
I’m usually fairly good when it comes to not eating processed food,
driving an excessive amount, and running up the electricity bill. In my opinion
the most mind boggling stat was that if everyone were to live like me, we’d
need 4.5 planets to provide enough resources - 4.5!
I
agree with the results. It seems a
bit unfathomable that if everyone lived like me, we would need four and a half
planets to provide enough resources, but when you think about it roughly half
of the worlds population doesn’t have electricity and don’t live a normal
American lifestyle. When things
are put into perspective it can really change ones mindset.
According
to the pie chart my highest category is services at 44%. Second is food at 22%, third is goods
at 13%, and lastly are shelter and mobility at 11%. I found it interesting that the food was the second leading
contributor to my carbon footprint. In the future I will be sure to take into account the
services that contribute to the carbon footprint.
I
also found it interesting that to support my lifestyle, it takes 20.2 global
acres of the Earth’s productive area.
This equates to 21.7 tons of carbon dioxide. The leader for acreage is the land needed for energy. A global acre is the unit we use to
measure the productivity of an average acre of land. More specifically, it represents an aggregate, world-average
productivity for all biologically productive land and water in a given year
(Global Footprint Calculator Network).
Pie chart numerical values (top right): Services 44%, Food 22%, Shelter 11%, Mobility 11%, Goods 13% |
GREENING
THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM
The
two potential solutions (both being complicated) to “greening the economic
system” are to change the makeup of the system or find creative ways to adjust
existing incentives and constraints towards encouraging environmental
protection. From my carbon
footprint, I found that the two largest sectors were services (44%) and food
(22%). Food and services go hand
in hand because growing, farming, processing, transporting, storing, cooking,
and disposing of the food that you eat produce greenhouse gas emissions
everyday. 66% of my carbon
footprint are related to services and food, so what are some creative ways to
green the economic system?
Kroger
(grocery stores) could receive incentives from the city if they only use paper/mesh
bag when bagging groceries. Grocery
stores getting incentives to use paper/mesh vs. plastic would be better because
the process of making plastic bags comes from a non-renewable resource. Local farmer markets receive a
monthly income from state governments to promote organic foods. Organic farming methods for both
animals and crops have a lower impact on the environment than normal methods. Not only is organic food better for the
environment, but healthy too! Lastly,
recycling and reusing items around the household is beneficial. Glass jars and plastic containers make
great storage options. All three of
these ideas would help to reduce the overall carbon footprint.
Hi, Brian:
ReplyDeleteGreat job. (I couldn't actually see your footprint screenprint, though!). I am glad that you recognized that at least part of the cause of your high footprint (which is actually just above the national average) is systemic. That is, service consumption is high because we almost all use energy produced from the United States's fossil-fuel intensive grid, and we buy food and other products shipped to our stores on trucks traveling long distances or on planes, etc. To some degree, we can reduce our footprint via personal choices (e.g., eating locally), but in other ways it is very difficult to do so unless you want to build an off-grid house entirely fueled by solar or wind. You had some good ideas about how to reduce the food component of services, but what about the large energy chunk?
1.9/1.9